01.01.2018
Trockenbearbeitung von Schichtverbundwerkstoffen im Flugzeugbau
MAPAL entwickelt Bohr-Senk-Werkzeuge für die gängigen Kombinationen
Die Herausforderungen, die Werkzeughersteller für optimale Lösungen in der Endmontage von Flugzeugen zu meistern haben, sind vielfältig. Dabei spielen nicht nur die unterschiedlichen Werkstoffe oder die Forderung nach höchster Prozesssicherheit, sondern auch das Kühlkonzept, die engen Toleranzvorgaben und die eingesetzten Maschinen eine entscheidende Rolle. MAPAL hat sich intensiv mit diesen Herausforderungen beschäftigt und entsprechende Werkzeugkonzepte auf den Markt gebracht. Unter anderem zur prozesssicheren Trockenbearbeitung von Materialkombinationen wie CFK-Aluminium oder verschiedenen Aluminiumlegierungen.
Hochfeste und gleichzeitig leichte Materialien sind in der Luftfahrt von zentraler Bedeutung. Durch neue Materialkombinationen können Flugzeugbauer das Gewicht senken, die Festigkeit und Korrosionsbeständigkeit erhöhen sowie eine Vereinfachung der Montage durch integrative Bauweise erreichen. Während Strukturbauteile aus Aluminium, Titan oder hochfesten Stählen auf Bearbeitungszentren oder Portalmaschinen bearbeitet werden, bearbeiten die Mitarbeiter in der Endmontage die Bauteile meist mit handgeführten Maschinen, Bohrvorschubeinheiten oder mithilfe von Robotern.
Deshalb unterscheiden sich die Anforderungen an die Werkzeughersteller und Werkzeuge für die Endmontage maßgeblich von denen für die Teilefertigung. Die bearbeiteten Bauteile in der Teilefertigung haben einen Wert von rund 1.000 bis 50.000 Euro haben. Die Bauteile in der Endmontage sind, abhängig vom Montagefortschritt, mit einem Wert von etwa 50.000 bis 2.000.000 Euro schon deutlich kostenintensiver. Die Flugzeugbauer müssen fehlerhafte Bearbeitungen entweder aufwendig und kostspielig manuell nacharbeiten oder die Bauteile komplett ersetzen. Aus diesem Grund wählen sie ihre Lieferanten für die Endmontage sehr gewissenhaft aus.
Challenges for tool manufacturers in final assembly
State-of-the-art: Manufacturing bores for rivet connections
Aircraft manufacturers use rivet connections for connecting the outer skin to the structural parts underneath. For this purpose, innumerable bores are drilled. To achieve the lowest resistance to the airstream as possible (low cW value), the rivet heads are countersunk in the outer skin. For this, an additional countersinking must be added to the bore entrance. In the past, a process with up to four individual machining steps was often required (drilling from the solid, boring, reaming, countersinking).
Today machining in just one step, where bore and countersink are realised in one process, is state of the art. Only in this way was automatic machining using robots possible. Previously this type of machining was realised with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). After machining, the parts had to be disassembled, cleaned and remounted. In addition the cooling medium got inside the aircraft where further assembly steps were taking place at the same time. The demand for tools for dry machining different composite workpiece materials
was the consequence.
Call for dry machining
One-step processing
In contrast to a multi-stage drilling process, the combination tool must undertake all work steps (drilling, boring, reaming and countersinking) during machining and bore the rivet connection in one step. In this way, both the position of the bore and the alignment between the cylindrical part of the bore and the countersinking are ensured. Angular errors or offset that can occur with multi-stage operations are therefore excluded.
Together with other quality characteristics of the machining result such as diameter, transition radius and countersinking angle, the burr at the bore outlet plays an important role. If a burr has formed at the bore outlet for multi-stage bore machining that was manually executed, it can be removed without great effort with the aid of a countersink. If the process is automated in only one step, manual deburring is not possible. For this reason, the relevant tool must be able to drill virtually burr-free. Aircraft manufacturers usually specify a maximum burr height of 0.1 mm. In addition to the burrs at the bore outlet, the interlaminar burrs between the layers can arise. If they form, the multilayer composite must be dismantled at the end of the drilling operation to remove the interlaminar burrs. Dismantling is time consuming and cost-intensive and so these burrs must also be avoided.
Consequences of the machining concept
The machine concept significantly affects the tool geometry. CNC applications on machining centres or portal machines are characterised by a high rigidity and stable machine control. As a result, the tool is very well guided in the bore. Applications with drill feed units, robots or hand-held machines are less stable and require tools with additional stabilising features for high accuracies.
Another special feature of drill feed units are the so-called “nose pieces”, also called guide bushes. The chips are removed above the tool through the long and narrow guide bushes up to a suction channel that is located at the end of the guide bush. To be able to remove the chips, long chip spaces are required that must be correctly dimensioned and adapted.
The bores at the outer skin (fuselage and wing) are drilled with portal machines or robots. The inaccessible drill machining steps, mainly in final assembly, are then drilled with drill feed units or with hand-held drills.
Challenges of machining multilayer composite materials
Tools for machining composite materials
The outer skin and ribs of the latest generation of aircraft consist primarily of a composite made of CFRP and aluminium. In addition, combinations made of different aluminium alloys or CFRP titanium are often used in the aerospace sector. The dimensional accuracy of the bores in this composite material is crucial. The bore must feature exactly the same diameter in both materials of the respective combination. In principle drilling always takes place from the outside to the inside. For example, the bore entrance and the countersinking is in the outer skin that consists of CFRP when machining CFRP/ aluminium, and the bore outlet is in the structure underneath that is designed in aluminium. During the individual machining of CFRP and aluminium materials, the geometries of the tools as well as the cutting data are fundamentally different.
In contrast for CFRP-titanium combinations, tools with a cutting edge that is sufficiently stable are required to withstand the ductile titanium and simultaneously have the appropriate sharpness to cut the CFRP. Whether merely one boring process suffices to produce a bore or whether the bore must be subsequently reamed depends on the required bore tolerance for this material combination.
Tools for drilling composite materials made of different aluminium alloys, for example 7050 and 2024, do not need a wear-inhibiting coating. This is because the grades of aluminium used in aircraft construction contain no or very little silicon and can therefore be drilled virtually without wear. This multilayer composite is significantly different to composites that contain CFRP when machining.
Tools that are used for material combinations that contain CFRP are generally provided with a diamond layer. This counteracts the abrasion of the CFRP and enables long tool lives. Regrinding these tools is not possible as the diamond layer used has a very high hardness.
Was müssen Werkzeughersteller bei der Auslegung berücksichtigen, um Prozesssicherheit bei der Bearbeitung zu gewährleisten?
- Qualitätsanforderung
- Material
- Bearbeitungsprozess
Da die Großzahl der Bohrungen im Flugzeug aufgrund der Nieten eine Senkung benötigen, ist der Bohrungsaustritt kritischer zu bewerten, um kostenintensive Nacharbeiten auszuschließen.
Was genau müssen die Werkzeuge verhindern?
- Delaminationen
- Faserüberstände
- Gratbildung
Wichtig ist bei der Bearbeitung aller Einzelmaterialien sowie aller Schichtverbundwerkstoffe zudem die Spanabfuhr. Ist diese nicht gewährleistet, liegt die Bohrungsqualität beim Trockenbohren schnell deutlich außerhalb der geforderten Toleranzen. Die größte Herausforderung bei der Entwicklung eines Trockenbohrers stellt aber die Anpassung der Werkzeuggeometrie auf das labile Bearbeitungssystem der Bohrvorschubeinheiten in Kombination mit Schnittparametern und Spannsystemen (ConcentricCollet) dar.
MAPAL Kombinationswerkzeug für die Trockenbearbeitung von Alu-Alu-Kombinationen
Im Einsatz bei einem Flugzeughersteller: das Bohr-Senk-Werkzeug zur Bearbeitung von Alu-Alu-Kombinationen
- Einsatzort: Längsnaht im hinteren Hauptfeld
- Durchmesser: 4,748 mm
- Senkstufe: 100°
- Drehzahl: 2.959 min-1
- Vorschub: 0,154 mm
- Standzeit: 1600 Bohrungen
- Toleranz: 4,73-4,805 mm
Drilling/countersinking tools for machining CFRP/aluminium combinations
To reliably dry machine composite materials made of CFRP and aluminium, MAPAL has also developed a drill with countersink step. The special geometry of the tool ensures that the heat caused by machining is not transferred to the part. In addition, neither part nor work environment is contaminated with coolant. The drill with two cutting edges made of solid carbide combines the properties of a drill for machining aluminium with those of a drill for CFRP machining. Reliable removal of the chips is ensured by the specially designed chip spaces. As CFRP is an extremely abrasive material, the drill is diamond-coated. This means that eight times the tool life is achieved compared with an uncoated drill.
The drilling/countersinking tool for dry machining CFRPaluminium combinations has been successfully used by customers. A spindle speed of 5,000 RPM and a feed of 0.1 mm are applied. The tool impresses not only with regard to process reliability, tool life and machining result, but also because of the steady boring process.